You are sending a link to...
Life at the Zoo: Caring for the Weak
I went to the zoo recently. Amidst all the wonderful elephants, leopards, and cobras, I noticed two themes being propogated on signs, displays, and literature. First, were the references to evolution. Second, were the promotions to protect endangered animals. I was confused. Wasn't the concept of "survival of the fittest" inherent to evolution? Weren't those species not strong enough to survive (through evolution or adaptation) not worthy to survive? There appeared to be a contradiction in what I was reading. If I believe in the "survival of the fittest," then why protect animals from extinction? It just doesn't make sense to me. On the contrary, if I embrace Biblical creationism, then I am compelled to care for all of God's creation. None are weak and worthless. The call God placed on mankind in Genesis 1 is to manage, lead, and care for God's creation. Therefore, it's not ours to abuse, but to cherish and use wisely for His glory. That to me, sounds like a valid reason to protect and care for the endangered and the weak.
